Parole Board judges will decide this week whether to keep Baby P’s killer mother behind bars
- She was jailed in 2009 for causing or allowing 17-month-old son Peter’s death
- The poor child was found with more than 50 injuries in a blood-splattered cot
- Connelly, 40, was told in March her fourth bid for freedom had been successful
- But Dominic Raab told the Commons ministers would be appealing decision
Parole Board judges could rule within days on a Government bid to keep the mother of Baby P, who died after months of abuse, behind bars.
Justice Secretary Dominic Raab pledged in March to appeal against the board’s recommendation to free Tracey Connelly, 40, from prison.
Connelly was jailed at the Old Bailey in 2009 for causing or allowing the death of her 17-month-old son Peter at their home in Tottenham, north London, on August 3 2007.
This was Connelly’s fourth parole review after she was released on licence in 2013 but recalled to prison in 2015 for breaching her parole conditions by ‘developing intimate personal relationships’ online and inciting another resident at her accommodation to engage in ‘inappropriate sexualised behaviour’.
The Parole Board, which is independent of government, received a formal request to review the decision last week under the ‘reconsideration mechanism’ and said it would be looked at as soon as possible by senior judges.
A ruling is expected on Thursday this week, it is understood.
Introduced in July 2019, the reconsideration mechanism allows the Justice Secretary and the prisoner in question to challenge the Parole Board’s decision within 21 days if they believe them to be ‘procedurally unfair’ or ‘irrational’.
Victims and members of the public can also make a request via the minister.
But the threshold is high and is the same as is required when seeking a judicial review.
Parole Board judges could rule within days on a Government bid to keep Tracey Connelly, 40, pictured, the mother of Baby P, who died after months of abuse in August 2007, behind bars
The provisions also make clear that ‘being unhappy’ with the decision is not grounds for reconsideration.
It is understood in this case the intervention was made on the grounds the decision was ‘irrational’, in that it makes no sense based on the evidence of risk that was considered, and that no other parole judges would come to the same conclusion.
If the application is refused, the decision and reasons for this will be published, but if accepted, then a review and fresh hearing will take place.
A Parole Board spokesman said: ‘An application under the reconsideration mechanism has been received from the Secretary of State for Justice for the case of Tracey Connelly and will be considered as soon as possible.
‘A senior judge will review the decision and the details of the case, and will then decide whether the decision should be reconsidered.
Justice Secretary Dominic Raab (pictured) pledged in March to appeal against the board’s recommendation to free Tracey Connelly, 40, from prison
‘If the application is accepted, the case will be sent for another parole review, which will be arranged as a priority.
‘If the application is rejected the senior judge will provide published written reasons for why the decision was not reconsidered.’
News of the proposal for Connelly to be released came as Mr Raab laid out plans to overhaul the parole process as he vowed to ‘enforce public safety’.
Known publicly as Baby P, Peter had suffered more than 50 injuries despite being on the at-risk register and receiving 60 visits from social workers, police officers and health professionals over eight months.
A series of reviews identified missed opportunities for officials to save the toddler’s life had they reacted properly to warning signs.
Connelly was handed a sentence of imprisonment for public protection with a minimum term of five years after admitting her crimes.
Her boyfriend Steven Barker and his brother Jason Owen were also convicted.
Known publicly as Baby P, Peter (pictured) had suffered more than 50 injuries despite being on the at-risk register and receiving 60 visits from social workers, police officers and health professionals over eight months
Source: Read Full Article